"Wherefore We must interrupt a silence which it would be criminal to prolong, that We may point out...as they really are, men who are badly disguised." Pope St. Pius X, September 8, 1907, Pascendi Dominici Gregis

Friday, December 30, 2016

As 2017 Begins, US on Verge of Nuclear War with Russia

For anyone familiar with the apparition of the Blessed Virgin Mary at Fatima, current affairs could not provide a more ominous backdrop to the centennial of this most renowned religious event of the previous century. In 1917 three shepherd children in the Portuguese hinterland revealed to the world with startling accuracy that World War II was coming and that Russia would be overtaken by a gruesome ideology and attempt to spread it all over the world. A "third secret" that remains occulted to this very day was also revealed to these children accompanied by a miracle of the sun, reported by over 50,000 witnesses among them unbelievers and Masonic journalists (akin to our CNN of today).

With the Pope of the Catholic Church sounding more like Obama's Press Secretary than the leader of one of the most rigorous religious traditions in the world, and a cabal of child-abusing politicians led by an evil billionaire attempting to block the very results of an election in the United States mere months ago they were demanding the now victorious opposition candidate unconditionally accept, you'd be forgiven by even the most extreme atheist for indulging in a little religious speculation. It may simply be par for the course that the very country that is being blamed for the undesired election result and with which the current administration has been trying to start a war, first in Ukraine, then in Syria and Turkey and most desperately in the last week as the US expels its personnel, Russia, is the very country the Lady at Fatima told the children must be consecrated by the Pope together with all the Bishops in the world in order to avoid very dire consequences - a request that remains unfulfilled.

Need we mention that what little is known about the untold third secret revealed by the Lady includes an unusual remark about a "bishop in white"? There have never been any Catholic bishops in white, as this color was reserved for the holder of highest office, the Pope. The reference to a 'bishop in white' remained nearly inexplicable to Catholic ears, that is, until the unprecedented resignation of Pope Benedict XVI, who as Bishop Emeritus of Rome, continues to this day to wear the papal white of his former office.
Image result for lightning vatican
Lightening strikes the Vatican the same day as Benedict XVI announces his resignation, the first Pope to do so since the Middle Ages.

Oh, but we are only just getting started! No true prophecy is without its signs in the sky. To wit, as explained by John Hagee, in 2015 the world has just witnessed the fourth set of four blood moons with an intervening solar eclipse all occurring on Jewish high holy days within the last 500 years, fulfilling the very words of Revelation 6:12 "the sun became black as sackcloth of hair and the whole moon became as blood." Mr. Hagee asserts this is significant for the state of Israel and certainly in the past week we have seen the US, perhaps its strongest ally, unexpectedly abandon Israel.

What may be more foreboding though are the words of Fr. Malachi Martin, longtime Vatican insider, advisor to high-ranking Cardinal Bea, and one of the few who supposedly have seen in full the third secret of Fatima. In 1997 during an interview given to Bernard Janzen, Fr. Malachi warned listeners to look to the skies, especially in the spring of that year. It just so happens that the last time a set of four blood moons all occurring on Jewish high holy days with an intervening solar eclipse could have culminated was in 1996 to 1997, if not for the fact that the fourth and final blood moon expected in Spring of 1997 was only partial. In the time following that spring with no fourth full blood moon materializing, Fr. Martin admitted, "That means it won't happen for a while yet; we have a little more time."

What, exactly, did we have a little more time before? What dire consequences are to follow from Russia not being consecrated by the leaders of the Catholic Church as the Lady requested? These may be the gravest words of all spoken by Fr. Martin, sworn by oath not to reveal the specifics of the third secret.
“A physical chastisement of the nations, involving catastrophes, man-made or natural, on land, on water and in the atmosphere of the globe. A spiritual chastisement ... [consisting] of the disappearance of religious belief, a period of widespread unfaith in many countries. A central function of Russia in the two preceding series of events. In fact, the physical and spiritual chastisements, according to Lucia’s letter, are to be gridded on a fateful timetable in which Russia is the ratchet.”

Here, Lucia refers to the most prominent of the three shepherd children at Fatima. For many of the secular mind, the changes that hit the Catholic Church in the wake of the 1960s, a time when Our Lady ordered that the third secret be released by the Vatican because its meaning would be clearer, may be only a historical footnote. Of more relevance, perhaps, was that these changes came just as Soviet Russia, at the height of her power, was spreading atheistic, materialistic communism all over the globe and the nuclear arms race was heating up.

Today, though, the roles are reversed. If there is any country that openly defends Christian, albeit it Orthodox, social policy it is Russia. The West meanwhile is in full cultural decline and religious practice may in fact be at an all time low. It is not an exaggeration to say in France today there are more practicing traditional Muslims than Catholics.

And so, one should take more seriously the recent attempts of the Obama administration, in its final throws, to heat up tensions with Russia as we enter the year of the 100th anniversary of the apparition at Fatima. All of this religious speculation has so far proven true. Must we witness the final chapter in which Russia leads the world into a brutal chastisement? Or will the world turn back from the brink and towards its God? You must answer this question personally...     while there is still time.

Saturday, November 12, 2016

It's Afternoon Again in America

Far from a Reagan redux, the premature high-fiving within the alt-right while Trump already signals to 'conserve' certain portions of Obamacare and begins a rapprochement with the remaining and former political establishment, along with the far-worse cultural and fiscal situation in which we find ourselves should give pause to those who think the forces of truth and justice are firmly in power again. Trump has more to undo than any of his conservative predecessors ever did. And mere tax-cuts, while a step in the right direction, along with huge infrastructure and defense contracts handed out to the existing cohort of crony-capitalists, which may lead to job creation in the short-run, do not undo the institutional arrangements which have placed our country in these dire straits pre-Trump and would lead us back to our current predicament the minute the establishment gets its grimy hands back into the White House. We will need to see a much more forceful, structural cleaning-of-house if the Trump administration represents a true morning in America versus only a stay in her execution.

 Yes, Trump's seemingly instant post-election friendly relations with the likes of Paul Ryan, Mitch McConnell, Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton may only be a superficial strategy gauged to see how much of his real agenda he can push through using the facade of the establishment. Yet power corrupts and hobnobbing with the very criminals we have worked so vociferously to oppose is fraught with danger. Those of us most optimistic about the possibilities under a Trump administration must be the most vocal about the dangers of going off-rail.

With his election success, the media and establishment politicians are at their very weakest now. An emboldened strategy of finishing off the worst elements in these two, empowering at the peak of our momentum we who stand ready to replace them, is the best course forward in these trying times. It will be a tragic irony if Trump uses this moment to befriend those who are most assuredly to undermine him later. We must keep our wits about us in victory most especially. Let us hope the rapprochement lasts for one week and not a minute longer.

Those of us aware of the real structural problems within the United States, the cultural-deterioration which is unlikely to be fully reversed, the fractional-reserve banking system, the satanic elite's dehumanizing cashless economic plans must use this reprieve to strengthen our independent means of support in building farms, homesteads, independent businesses, redoubts, churches and small, informal communities, rather than blindly trusting the Trump administration and returning to a consumerist mind-set. Trump may end up being everything we hope for, he may over-confidently stumble at first and wake up to the full realities of Washington later, or he may represent only a temporary return to the better side of a Keynesian economic boom that will lead us right back to the elite's plans as soon as he leaves office. Regardless, it remains our job to continue to rebuild true civilization.

What realistically should the Trump administration look like? Using precedence within the American system, now seems time for an updated and renewed Jacksonian democracy (full credit to Wikipedia):
Also known as the spoils system, patronage was the policy of placing political supporters into appointed offices. Many Jacksonians held the view that rotating political appointees in and out of office was not only the right but also the duty of winners in political contests. Patronage was theorized to be good because it would encourage political participation by the common man and because it would make a politician more accountable for poor government service by his appointees. Jacksonians also held that long tenure in the civil service was corrupting, so civil servants should be rotated out of office at regular intervals.
Strict Constructionism
Like the Jeffersonians who strongly believed in the Kentucky and Virginia Resolutions, Jacksonians ...favored a federal government of limited powers. Jackson said that he would guard against "all encroachments upon the legitimate sphere of State sovereignty."
Laissez-faire Economics
Complementing a strict construction of the Constitution, the Jacksonians generally favored a hands-off approach to the economy, as opposed to the Whig program sponsoring modernization, railroads, banking, and economic growth.[12][13]
In particular, the Jacksonians opposed government-granted monopolies to banks, especially the national bank, a central bank known as the Second Bank of the United States. Jackson said, "The bank is trying to kill me, but I will kill it!" And he did so.[16]  Jackson himself was opposed to all banks because he believed they were devices to cheat common people; he and many followers believed that only gold and silver should be used to back currency, rather than the integrity of a bank.